The Napoleon Attack (is bad…)


As the story goes, Napoleon Bonaparte, the great general who later became Napoleon I of France in 17th and 18th century, was a great chess enthusiast, but not a very good player. As such, perhaps we can feel some degree of affinity with the man as he was probably at the beginner-intermediate level!

The Napoleon Attack, which is named after him, perhaps demonstrates the aggressive enthusiasm of a lower-level player, with an early queen move. It is very similar to the Wayward Queen Attack after a king’s pawn opening, e4 e5, but with the queen moving to the f3 square rather than h5. It is arguably a less good version of the Wayward Queen as white doesn’t immediately threaten the pawn on e5, and blocks in the natural development square of the king’s knight. If one is kind, it could potentially be seen as a more refined version of the Wayward Queen Attack that retains a degree of conservatism, but really, it’s just shittier!

The logic to the Napoleon Attack is to set up a scholar’s mate, but it’s easy to deflect. I’ve played one previous game before of the Napoleon Attack where I managed to achieve a reverse scholar’s mate on move 8. However, I think that player simply wasn’t very good. In the game today, I opted to play very provocatively by bringing out my own queen symmetrically to f6 to immediately nerf any glimmer of hope of a scholar’s mate. My opponent took the bait and we ended up with a moderately ridiculous queen trade on move 3 but leaving me effectively up a move of tempo.

The game then proceeded like a queen-less four knights game, and my opponent became undone by some unwise aggressive moves that resulted in a loss of material.

Game on chess.com: https://www.chess.com/game/live/46834176891

[Event "Live Chess"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2022.05.20"]
[Round "?"]
[White "prakashgarg3273"]
[Black "vitualis"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C20"]
[WhiteElo "1261"]
[BlackElo "1259"]
[TimeControl "1800"]
[EndTime "18:36:51 PDT"]
[Termination "vitualis won by resignation"]

1. e4 e5 2. Qf3 Qf6 3. Qxf6 Nxf6 4. Nc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 Bc5 6. Bc4 O-O 7. d3 d6 8. Ng5 Nd4 9. Bb3 h6 10. Nxf7 Rxf7 11. Bxf7+ Kxf7 12. Nd5 Nxd5 13. exd5 Nxc2+ 14. Kd2 Nxa1 15. f3 Bb4+ 16. Ke3 Nc2+ 17. Kf2 Bc5+ 18. Kg3 Be3 19. h4 h5 20. Bxe3 Nxe3 21. Rc1 Nxd5 22. b3 c5 23. Kf2 Nb4 24. Ra1 Nxd3+ 25. Kg3 Nb4 26. a3 Nc2 27. Ra2 Bf5 28. a4 a5 29. Rb2 Ra6 30. f4 exf4+ 31. Kxf4 Kf6 32. Rb1 Nd4 33. Rb2 Rb6 34. Rd2 Rxb3 35. Ra2 Rb4 36. Kg3 c4 37. Rd2 c3 38. Rd1 c2 39. Ra1 Rb1 40. Ra3 c1=Q 41. Rf3 Rb3 42. Rxb3 Nxb3 43. Kh2 0-1

One comment

Leave a reply to BLUNDER! Don’t play the Napoleon-ish Queen! – Adventures of a chess noob Cancel reply